Feed on
Posts
Comments

You lie . . .

Rep. Joe Wilson, the latest cause célèbre of the GOP and radical right,  continues to assert that the pending health-reform bill will cover illegal aliens – a truly awful phrase, let’s go with undocumented workers.

To be exact, Section 246 on page 143 of the bill says nothing about “non-US citizens” or immigrants, legal or otherwise. In fact, the legislation specifically states that “undocumented aliens” will not be eligible for credits to help them buy health insurance.

Mr. Wilson, the truth is “a bitch.” If you’re going to be a bore, why not be one about the truth.

Resumes seem to have a set form while cover letter get free reign. Don’t forget that the creativity behind a cover letter still needs some guidelines, according to Bruce A. Hurwitz, vice president of New York City-based Joel H. Paul & Associates, Inc., a national executive search firm for the nonprofit sector.

Hurwitz set the ground rules for cover letters at Fundraising Day in New York held by the Association of Fundraising Professionals Greater New York Chapter.

Check out his cover letter checklist:

  • Short and sweet. This isn’t your college thesis and potential employers don’t have time to read a novel. Keep your cover letter to the point.
  • Use bullets. Bullet points draw the eye to the most important information.
  • Credentials. Tell them why you would be the perfect fit for the job. Point out how you’ve solved problems or made decisions at prior jobs.
  • Contact information. Papers get separated. Make sure your contact information is on the cover letter. Try not to include any ridiculous e-mail addresses.
  • In closing. Hurwitz said to have an appreciative close to the letter. It shows you are grateful to be considered for the position.
  • Proofread. Spelling mistakes will put you in the “no” pile fast. Spell check, proofread, give it to someone else to proofread and then repeat. There’s no room for errors.

Source: Nonprofit Times

I find it mind boggling that the GOP has hijacked the Obama administration’s healthcare reform initiative even to the point of seeking raucous town hall-type meeting with miss-informed, angry citizens.

The September 7, 2009 issue of Newsweek has an outstanding piece on “The Five Biggest Lies in the Health Care Debate” by Sharon Begley. Everyone should read this article:

The lies are as follows:

  • You’ll Have No Choice in What Health Benefits You Receive
  • No Chemo for Older Medicare Patients
  • Illegal Immigrants Will Get Free Health Insurance
  • Death Panels Will Decide Who Lives
  • The Government Will Set Doctors’ Wages

It is just beyond reason that the GOP would mount a disinformation campaign about such a vital issue. Any reasonable person understands that we must have healthcare reform – and have it now. The day has long since come and gone when we can continue with the current patchwork system of non-coverage, denials, and errors. But in this country where we have been hijacked by crazies — reason, relevance and reality have gone out the window.

Federal student loan payments take a giant bite out of many a paycheck, but a new relief program could help you pocket more cash.

Here’s how the plan, part of the  College Cost Reduction and Access act of 2007 (which just went into effect this summer), works: Qualified participants (which you probably are if you owe as much as or more than you make in a year) have their loan payments capped at 15% of their discretionary income – a figure determined by your income, family size, and state of residence.

So a single person who makes less than $30,000 could, in most cases, cut a $350 monthly payment in half. Better still, any outstanding loan balance (interest included) will be automatically forgiven after 25 years, or 10 years if you have a government job or work for a nonprofit. Determine your eligibility and estimate your monthly payments at IBRinfo.org

Source: The Advocate

Consultants working in the Catholic fundraising market might face resistance to go beyond the collection basket on Sunday mentality, according to Graham Hunter, senior vice president at May Development Services, based in Greenwich, Conn.

The collection basket doesn’t allow Catholic donors to go deeper with the organization and misses the opportunity to communicate the extensive mission of the church. Consultants need to communicate to religious leaders why fundraising can ultimately help the mission, Hunter explained during the recent Bridge to Integrated Marketing & Fundraising Conference, in National Harbor, Md.

Here are some of his tips:

  • Get to know the client. The religious leader you work with might not have any experience fundraising. Try to explain why fundraising is important for the organization. Try to have a strategy and growth plan already developed that’s easy to explain.
  • Look at frequent communication. The traditional Catholic donor is used to communicating at least once a week with their church — on Sunday. So don’t think you should only contact donors every three months. Donors are twice more likely to give within the first six months versus the seven to 12 month range, so make sure you don’t lose that opportunity.
  • Complainers are not the focus group. “I can’t tell you how many great ideas have been squashed because two people complained,” said Hunter. Religious leaders don’t want to offend their followers, but point out that those who complain usually are the exception and not the rule.
  • Perceptions about premiums. Some Catholic leaders may argue that direct mail should be strictly mission-based. Hunter explained you need to find premiums that resonate, such as prayer cards or religious calendars, to drive premiums back to the mission.
  • Be accountable. Consultants, whether they are in the religious market or not, should show measureable results. Try to meet with leaders at least quarterly to discuss results and see if there are tweaks that need to be made.

Source: The Nonprofit Times

I am from Massachusetts and learned as a child to love the Kennedy’s.  For me, words can’t express the tremendous loss of “The Lion of the Senate.”  The president’s eulogy at the Senator’s funeral mass may come close to capturing some of my feelings.  I just want to share the very ending which I found so very moving:

What we can do is to live out our lives as best we can with purpose, and love, and joy. We can use each day to show those who are closest to us how much we care about them, and treat others with the kindness and respect that we wish for ourselves. We can learn from our mistakes and grow from our failures. And we can strive at all costs to make a better world, so that someday, if we are blessed with the chance to look back on our time here, we can know that we spent it well; that we made a difference; that our fleeting presence had a lasting impact on the lives of other human beings.

This is how Ted Kennedy lived. This is his legacy. He once said of his brother Bobby that he need not be idealized or enlarged in death beyond what he was in life, and I imagine he would say the same about himself. The greatest expectations were placed upon Ted Kennedy’s shoulders because of who he was, but he surpassed them all because of who he became. We do not weep for him today because of the prestige attached to his name or his office. We weep because we loved this kind and tender hero who persevered through pain and tragedy — not for the sake of ambition or vanity; not for wealth or power; but only for the people and the country he loved.

In the days after September 11th, Teddy made it a point to personally call each one of the 177 families of this state who lost a loved one in the attack. But he didn’t stop there. He kept calling and checking up on them. He fought through red tape to get them assistance and grief counseling. He invited them sailing, played with their children, and would write each family a letter whenever the anniversary of that terrible day came along. To one widow, he wrote the following:

“As you know so well, the passage of time never really heals the tragic memory of such a great loss, but we carry on, because we have to, because our loved one would want us to, and because there is still light to guide us in the world from the love they gave us.”

We carry on.

Ted Kennedy has gone home now, guided by his faith and by the light of those he has loved and lost. At last he is with them once more, leaving those of us who grieve his passing with the memories he gave, the good he did, the dream he kept alive, and a single, enduring image — the image of a man on a boat; white mane tousled; smiling broadly as he sails into the wind, ready for what storms may come, carrying on toward some new and wondrous place just beyond the horizon. May God Bless Ted Kennedy, and may he rest in eternal peace.

I can’t let this week pass without commenting on that fact that President Obama hosted a Monday, June 29th White House reception for three hundred people in honor of gay pride. This included the following historic 20-minute address on GLBT concerns.

In the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, a small gay bar – the Stonewall — in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of New York City, experienced an all too common, indiscriminate police raid on an illegal establishment — all gay bars were considered illegal meeting places since “homosexuals” were considered criminals by their very nature. The cops did what they always did – pillaged the place, attacked and arrested the patrons.  This was common fare: arrest everyone for unlawful assembly (resisting arrest was nearly always added as a crime) and haul everyone off to jail.  Not only did this result in jail time and fines but in many communities the names of the arrested were often printed in local papers resulting in the systematic outing of terrified, closeted men causing people to loose their jobs, be shamed out of their communities, destroy their families, and even drive people to commit suicide.

Well that night in Manhattan, something unheard of happened.   The bar attendees revolved against the cops and the brutality. The revolts that lasted for three nights are cited as the first instance in American history when people in the homosexual community fought back against a government-sponsored system that persecuted sexual minorities. The riots became the defining event that marked the start of the gay rights movement in the United States and around the world.

Stonewall has become the international symbol of the ongoing struggle by the GLBT community for acceptance and equal rights.  The U.S. government’s response to gay rights — with the exception of select comments made by President Bill Clinton — has been decided hostile, particularly by republican administrations. During the last eight years, the Bush Administration reversed any semblance of acceptance of gay and lesbian people by the government even reversing nondiscrimination policies that were enacted by the Clinton Administration for federal employees.

There are many in the gay community now that are very angry with President Obama.  Candidate Obama was quick to promise repeal of the military’s discriminatory DADT policy and DOMA.  Further, we were assured that the president would use his bully pulpit to deliver expansive national hates crime legislation and ENDA - inclusive federal employment protections.

I must add that I am tired of waiting. Any form of “separate but equal” is beneath the constitutional promise for all GLBT people. It’s been six months since Obama’s election. Mr. President, the time to act is now!

But this historic moment of a U.S. president inviting 300 GLBT leaders to the White House and celebrating their full value and inclusion is monumental.  Words cannot capture the significance of this event or my happiness that I have lived into this day.

This country - indeed many countries — have done yeoman’s work demonizing gay people, banishing us from their communities, forcing us to live in shame and fear, chasing us from religious institutions, and making us easy targets of attack and murder.

But I do believe that as more people realize that gay rights are no more a “special right” that the full and fair inclusion of other minorities, change will continue. In what would have been unheard of just a few years ago, we are now witnessing state after state change their laws to allow same-sex marriage.

So we can’t overlook what happened on Monday.

The very fact the 44th President of the United States on the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall Riots chose to celebrate this historic event at the White House is monumental.  Mr. President while I am holding you to your word that your administration — judged by the expansive moral arch — will delivery on your promises to my community — I thank you from the bottom of my heart for what you did this week.

For those who follow my blog, I am sure that you have noticed a “silence” over the past month and a half. Well there is a reason. On May 12, I underwent total hip replacement surgery. This came on very quickly – actually with only six days advance notice.

For the first seven weeks – post surgery – I managed on crutches, home rehab, and no driving. Thankfully, for the past two weeks, I’ve sequed to outpatient physical therapy and have been able to drive.

I don’t want to go into the details other than to mention three things. The operation went wonderfully and I am totally without the blistering pain that finally brought me into surgery (I have been living with the pain since 2004). U.S. healthcare is wonderful if you have private health insurance. Oxycontin and Vicodin don’t mix with try to write intelligently for a blog. I am now ready to start posting again.

awardThe Drucker Institute Announces Call for Applications for $100,000 Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation. The Drucker Institute at Claremont Graduate University has announced a call for applications for the 2009 Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation.

The first-place prize is $100,000. That’s up from the $35,000 awarded in previous years, thanks to a generous grant from The Coca-Cola Foundation. The second-place award is $7,500, and the third-place prize is $5,000.

For more information and to submit an application for the award: click here.

mythsAs we begin to considered universal healthcare for all Americans, it is amazing how the same “objections” that deep-sixth the Clinton attempt to provide coverage to more Americans is reading its ugly head.

An outstanding article entitled “Eight Myths About Health Care Reform” is featured in the July-August 2009 issue of The AAPR Magazine. It deserves to be repeated.

Americans spend more on health care every year than we do on education, building roads, even feeding ourselves – and estimated $2.6 trillion in 2009, or around $8,300 per person. Forty-five million Americans have no health insurance whatsoever. These staggering figures are at the heart of the current debate over healthcare reform: the need to control costs while providing care for all. As John Lumpkin, M.D., M.P.H., director of Health Care Group for the Robert Word Johnson Foundation, says, “There is enough evidence that it is now time to do something and to do the right think.” The key is to focus on the facts – and to dispel, once and for all, the myths that block our progress.

Myth 1 - Health reform won’t benefit people who have insurance. Just because you have health insurance today doesn’t mean you will have it tomorrow. According to the National Coalition on Healthcare, nearly 266,000 companies dropped their employees’ health coverage from 2000 to 2005. “People with insurance have a tremendous stake, because their insurance is at risk,” says Judy Feder, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a Washington, DC-based think tank. What’s more, in recent years, the average employee health insurance premium rose nearly eight times faster than income. “Everyone is paying for health increases in some way, and it’s unsustainable for everyone,” says Stephanie Cathcart, spokesperson for the National Federation of the Independent Business (NFIB). “Reform will benefit every one as long as it addresses costs.

Myth 2 - The boomers will bankrupt Medicare. If you’re looking to blame the rise in health care costs on an aging population, you’ll have to look elsewhere. The growing ranks of the elderly are projected to account for just 0.4 percent of the future growth in health care costs skyrocketing. Ginsburg and others point to all those fancy medical technologies we now rely on (think MRIs and CT-scans), as well as our fee-for-service payment system, in which doctors are paid by how many patients they see and how many treatments they prescribe, rather than the q8ality of care they provide. Some experts say this fee-for-service payment system encourages overtreatment

Myth 3 - Reforming our heath care system will cost us more. Think of health care reform as if it’s an Energy Star appliance. Yes, it costs more to replace your old energy-guzzling refrigerator with a new one, but over time the savings can be substantial. The Commonwealth Fund, a New York City-based foundation that supports research on health care practice and policy, estimates that heath care reform will cost roughly $600 billion to implement but by 2020 could save us approximately $3 trillion

Myth 4 - My access to quality health care will decline. Just because you have access to lots of doctors who prescribe lots of treatments doesn’t mean you’re getting good care. In fact, researchers at Dartmouth College have found that patients who receive more care actually fare worse than those who receive less care. In one particularly egregious example, heart attack patients in Los Angeles spent more days in the hospital and underwent more tests and procedures that heart attack patients in Salt Lake City, yet the patients in L.A. died at a higher rate than those in Salt Lake City. (Medicare also paid $30,000 for the L.A. patients’ care, versus $23,000 for the care of the patients with better outcomes in Salt Lake City).

Myth 5 - I won’t be able to visit my favorite doctor. Mention health reform and immediately people worry that they will have fewer options – in doctors, treatments, and diagnostic testing. The concern comes largely during discussions of comparative effectiveness research (CER): research on which treatments work and which don’t. But 18 organizations in a broad coalition, including AARP, NFIB, Consumers Union, and Families USA, support CER – and believe that far from limiting choices, it will instead prevent errors and give physicians the information they need to practice better medicine. A good example: Doctors routinely prescribe newer and more expensive medications for high blood pressure when studies show that older medications work just as well, if not better. “There is a tremendous value in new technology, but in our healthcare system we don’t weigh whether these treatments work, says Feder. “Expensive treatments replace less expensive ones for no reason.”

Myth 6 - The uninsured actually do have access to good care – in the emergency room. It is true that the United States has an open-door-policy for those who seek emergency care, but “emergency room care doesn’t help you get the right information to prevent a condition or give you help managing it,” says Maria Ghazal, director of public policy for the Business Roundtable, an association of CEOs at major U.S. companies. Forty-one percent of the uninsured have no access to preventive care, so when they do go to the ER, “they are most likely going in a time when their illness has progressed significantly and costs more to treat,” says Lumpkin. Hospitals have no way to recoup the costs of treating the uninsured, so they naturally pass on some of those costs to their insured patients.

Myth 7 - We can’t afford to tackle this problem now. We may be in the middle of a recession, but as Robert Zirkelbach, spokesperson for America’s Health Insurance Plans, says, “the most expensive thing we can do is nothing at all.” If we do nothing, the Congressional Budget Office projects that our annual health costs will soar to about $13,000 per person in 2017, while the number of uninsured will climb to 54 million by 2019. Already more than half of Americans say they have cut back on health care in the past year due to costs concerns. Roughly one in four of us say we put off care we needed, and one in five of us didn’t fill a prescription. Clearly, the urgency is greater now than ever before.

Myth 8 - We’ll end up with socialized medicine. Some experts favor a single-payer system similar to Medicare or the health program offered to federal-government employees. Yet all the proposals being discussed today would build on our current system, Feder says – which means that private insurers and the government are both likely to play roles. Says Lumpkin: “There are many ways to solve our health care problems, but we will come up with a uniquely American solution, and that solution will be a mixed public and private solution.

Karen Cheney is a Philadelphia-based writer who specialized in money and health care issues

Source: Cheney, K. (2009, July-August). Eight myths about health care reform: And why we can’t afford to believe them anymore. The AARP Magazine, July-August, 22-25.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »